Skip to content

Tag Archives: harm-reduction

UPDATE: Controversial China Tobacco Research Withdrawn from Prize Competition

Health advocates, scientists win battle to beat sham science

15 Strategies for Mindful Smoking

If you decided to take the path of harm reduction, either as a short-term mindful-smoking sabbatical (as you gear up for the next attempt at quitting) or an open-ended, long-term harm-reduction commitment, you will have to learn how to get more out of less. To do so, you’ll have to shift from mindless smoking to mindful smoking. Here are 15 strategies to consider (from Smoke-Free Smoke Break).

A critique of human rights based approaches should demonstrate an understanding of human rights based approaches

Jia-shin Chen’s recent commentary () ‘Beyond human rights and public health: Citizenship issues in harm reduction’ demonstrates little understanding of human rights, undermining its central critique.

Brad Rodu: Could Obama administration ban tobacco? : Prohibition seems to have support within the Department of Health and Human Services.

“Ending the Tobacco Epidemic: A Federal Plan” is the startling title of a speech scheduled Wednesday, March 14, by Dr. Howard Koh, assistant secretary for health in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Clinical Service Desires of Medical Cannabis Patients

Background: Medical cannabis dispensaries following the social or hybrid model offer supplementary holistic services in addition to dispensing medical cannabis. Historically, alternative physical health services have been the norm for these dispensaries, including services such as yoga, acupuncture, or chiropractor visits. A clinical service dearth remains for medical cannabis patients seeking substance use, misuse, dependence, and mental health services

Smokeless tobacco ‘could help save lives’

Replacing smoking products with e-cigarettes or modern, spit-free smokeless tobacco can greatly reduce risk of disease and death in smokers, say scientists. These products provide a much safer alternative for those smokers who are unable or unwilling to quit smoking because they continue to deliver nicotine without the harmful effect of smoking.

“A Costly Turn On”: Patterns of use and perceived consequences of mephedrone based head shop products amongst Irish injectors

Abstract: Background: Mephedrone injecting has recently been reported in Romania, Slovenia, Guernsey and Ireland. The research reported here aimed to describe the experiences of a group of Irish injecting drug users, who were injecting mephedrone based headshop products prior to the introduction of legislative controls in Ireland, with particular focus on pre- and post-legislative use, effects of injecting mephedrone, settings and contexts for injecting, polydrug use and serial drug injecting, risk perceptions and harm reduction practises.Methods: Following a predevelopment phase with a Privileged Access Interviewer, in-depth interviews using a phenomenological approach were conducted with eleven attendees of a low threshold harm reduction service.Results: The findings describe the abuse potential of these mephedrone based headshop products when used by intravenous injection

MAIELLANO: A Simple Tobacco Fable: Alternative products are helping to shape the future of convenience store tobacco sets.

If you followed this fable so far, you can see where I am going. Today’s real world attitude toward tobacco is misdirected and ill-founded

UofL research shows substituting with smokeless tobacco saves lives: Presentation at AAAS shows scientific foundation for tobacco harm reduction…

Substituting smokeless tobacco products can save smokers’ lives, and there is a scientific foundation that proves it.

ROSS: How Health Regulators Are Killing American Smokers : Gilbert Ross finds that public health regulators, through willfull resistance of tobacco…

Given the intolerable loss of life and health attributable to smoking, why are the skeptics at the FDA, the American Cancer Society and the CDC stonewalling America’s smokers about harm reduction? I believe it’s because those experts recall too well the tobacco industry’s reprehensible behavior during the last century, and simply do not trust anything that the industry proposes. But who pays for this failure to enter the 21st century and accept reality?